Archive for January, 2007

Being a Great Place to Work

Wednesday, January 31st, 2007

 JR 2006    The value equation for profitable ventures involves intangibles beyond the spreadsheet.  A candid breakfast discussion in with some local legends in Dallas this morning, organized by Tad McIntosh at HumCap, gave some unusual insight into what it takes to be a “great place to work” and some bottom line implications.

 Stan Richards – Stan quantified the reduced turnover benefit of a good workplace environment – “We get great value from being a great place to work” – one point being, in advertising it is not unusual for a person to have 7 jobs in 10 years…  thus that person never really gets to know his clients, perhaps just as he knows them he leaves.  As a result, longer tenure at the Richards group leads to greater tenure with the client, leading to greater understanding of the client and what it takes to make their business grow.  A flip side to that is not everyone who joins is perfect for his firm.  Stan reiterated the challenge of not firing people who are not going to work out soon enough.  “Make the call early”.  Stan also covered the open culture at the Richards group.  This was in line with the overall cross-functional, non-siloed, casual contact across-lines-of-function theme of the breakfast.  He said that to operate in an office environment without doors “There are certain things the CEO has to give up.  One of them is privacy.”  This is because, in his case,  “agencies are hotbeds of paranoia” where the rumor of client loss leads to rumors of layoffs, leading to speculation one the part of the employee about their fate, etc.  Thus closed door meetings lead to loss of productivity

Ralph Hawkins – Ralph reiterated Stan’s position of having small cross-functional teams rather than building large and separate functional groups (what Stan calls Tribes)  to expand.  He said his work teams number about 35, and that as a result HKS works like a series of smaller firms, also with an open office layout.  Ralph found generational differences - the millennial workforce to be hardworking but very interested in life/work balance.  DFW Family magazine has voted HKS the family-friendliest place to work in DFW, based in part on their focus on working mothers. 

Conversely, Stan held that “I understand generational differences, I just try not to recognize them”.  He said the focus of their culture was that there were no unimportant jobs or people at their organization, that you are critical at the Richards Group no matter what you do.  He felt this approach led to the highest possible level of engagement.So what are the quantifiable benefits of this higher level of engagement?

 Steve LaMotta- quoted the value of top performers is 2-4x average performer, and that engaged employees perform at a level 20% above the non-engaged, and have lower turnover and related costs, with Bristol Meyers quoted as stating a cost of $500k for each senior executive they lose. These CEO experiences were for classic service businesses, which differ in critical ways from, say, software development.  However the focus on communication across disciplinary lines, openness, and cross-disciplinary teams fit any business model.  -John Reed 

The 3-Point VC Pitch

Thursday, January 25th, 2007

  JR 2006    The 3-point VC Funding Checklist

I’ve spent the last several months with the VC/private equity community, and with entrepreneurs/owners that want to take their business to the next level.  These posts have been about today’s disconnect between investment opportunities – which are currently very good – and available capital in this regional market, which has been better.

In talking with entrepreneurs about getting funded, the conversations keep coming back to a 3-part model that gets drawn on the best available napkin.  Nothing really original, it’s kind of a strategic mutt that gets to the heart of any funding discussion.  The three elements:

The 1) Team and the 2) Technology make a business interesting, investigable.  As an entrepreneur, no one cares about your model or sector or idea without knowing about your people (smart, good track record, sector expertise) and technology (for competitive entry barriers and exit valuation).  But if the team and technology check out, then it’s the 3) Model that makes your deal investable

A common phrase in VC pitches is that “this will be a great little business”.  This is spoken without knowing that across the table your audience just mentally closed your file. (“Run Away! Run Away!”) If the sector is not large enough to support nice growth, or is not itself growing, or the business does not scale profitably, then that deal is in the large class of “great little businesses” for the principals to earn a living, but not for investors to earn a return on exit that matches the investment risks:

                  ex-a-tec-dfw-11-16-2006-2-pager.jpg           exatec-dfw-_2-revised.jpg

These intriguing blurry thumbnails are from a presentation made last fall to the Dallas alumni of Monterrey Tech.  The full image won’t post here, but email me: ‘Southwestventure’ at Gmail for the powerpoint version.  The point, and I do have one, is not to get too lost in pitching the wonderfulness of your widget or idea, at least not until the answers to these three questions are convincingly made.  Or else that exit your audience is planning may be from you.

-JR

Year Good, Quarter Bad

Tuesday, January 16th, 2007

JR 2006     Some interesting news this morning from the NVCA and Thomson regarding venture investment last year and especially in Q4.  This release coincided with a good presentation made by Stephane Dupont of the NVCA this morning at SMU’s SWVF breakfast in Dallas.
 

Stephane reviewed the usual 2006 trends:
 

  1. Despite the national trend towards an increase in life sciences investments, Texas lags the national average in this category
  2. Polarization – the larger funds are attracting increasingly greater percentages of the annual $ raise
  3. Exits remains at 90+% M&A, (vs. majority IPO for the 90’s) – Stephane quoted “six years of darkness” for VC IPO’s, with 157 IPO’s/y 1991-2000, and 27 IPO’s/y 2001-2006.

This morning’s NVCA/Thomson release detailed Q4 fundraising results for both VC and PE fundraising.  Although total 2006 figures were up for the year, the fundraising pace slowed dramatically in Q4, down roughly 70% vs. 2005 for VC and roughly 45% for Private Equity.  The implication of the news is that this is a healthy breather in the mezzanine/buyout investment class.

 -John Reed

2006 - A Record Year For Private Equity/VC/Mezzanine Fundraising

Thursday, January 11th, 2007

JR 2006     Today’s Dow Jones summary of total US private equity capital raised in 2006 paints an interesting picture.  The total raise for 2006 was a record $215.4 billion, up 33% from 2005 and in excess of the year 2000 record.  
Of that, 79% went to private equity and mezzanine funds, and 12% to venture capital.  

In a record year, the total venture capital raise was down 2% from 2005.

The implications for 2007 include continued pricing pressure for large deals, especially considering the backlog of uninvested capital in an ongoing positive fundraising environment.  For “VC-sized” transactions there remains a healthy capital availability, although venture capital has greatly declined as a percentage of total capital raised since the previous record year of 2000.  I’m digging to find the ratio of Texas-based VC funds raised to the overall VC raise for 2006.

-John J. Reed
 
Source: Dow Jones Financial Information Services

Southwest Venture Search Bar Launches

Friday, January 5th, 2007

 jr nov 06    OK, now Happy New Year!

To the right of this post is a new addition - the Southwest Venture Search Bar.  It was built by Multiview and is free of banners and advertising.

It allows readers to search Texas-based VC’s, Private Equity firms, and related portfolio companies in a targeted way. 

The database was initially loaded to search the websites of roughly 200 VC’s and PE’s, reaching fund partners, hundreds of portfolio companies, their top management and related career opportunites.

As an example, by searching for “opening”, 72 results are generated, listing Texas VC-backed portfolio companies that are exanding operations and opening a new office.  A search for “B Round” yields over 100 results for Texas-funded companies that have closed a second round of financing.

Please forward your ideas for sites that should be included/added to deepen the results pool.  I look forward to improving the site.  If you have any questions or would like to discuss, you can contact me at “southwestventure” on gmail.

-JR