Scoping the Texas Investment Opportunity
This morning, Eric Tom forwarded an email article on the VC market in Texas. In summary, the lack of growth capital in Texas has gotten the attention of the State Government, which is not always a bad thing.
From today’s “PE Week Wire”:
An Odd Proposal
Later this week, the Teacher Retirement System of Texas will take up a gubernatorial request that it allocate up to $600 million for direct venture capital investments into Texas-based companies and related technology endeavors. It is an odd proposal, to be sure, but not necessarily one to be dismissed out of hand.
TRS currently makes all of its venture capital investments as a limited partner in unaffiliated venture capital funds, as do most public pension systems. For example, its upcoming alternative assets committee meeting will consider fund commitments to both Leonard Green & Associates and Providence Equity Partners. Also like most public pensions, TRS buttresses a fairly meager alternatives staff with third-party consultants ( , in this case). As of August 2005, approximately 3.3% of the $93.32 billion system was invested in alternatives.
Hamilton Lane
But this new proposal from Gov. Perry is an attempt to shake up the TRS model, in order to promote local economic growth. Specifically, Perry is concerned that the local venture capital community has all but dissipated in the post-bubble years, and that the result is an unfair disadvantage for Texas-based startups. And he’s right.
Texas receives the third-most venture capital of any state, but this year will receive less than 25% from in-state investors. Compare that to #2 Massachusetts with over 36% from in-state. Sure outsiders are coming in, but it’s always difficult to attract VCs from outside the 50-mile radius. The result often is that entrepreneurs are either trying to bootstrap themselves or picking up and moving to the Coasts.
The problem - investment capital in Texas - is being recognized. And as long as the root of the problem is access to capital and not deal supply, the answers are easier. The infrastructure for deal/opportunity creation is complex and takes generations to create. The supply of capital to match those opportunities should be simpler and more quickly (and productively) responsive to large initiatives like these.
-John Reed
December 18th, 2006 at 8:35 pm
Another comment on the TRS proposal:
http://blog.marsdd.com/2006/12/12/everything-is-bigger-in-texas-specifically-venture-funds-if-a-new-proposal-is-passed/
-JR